Michael Baden Wrote:The [autopsy] photographer was there, the corpsman who usually took pictures of damaged hearts and cirrhotic livers and other diseases. He was snapping away when he caught the attention of an FBI agent, who came up to him and asked for his clearance. 'Clearance?' said the corpsman. 'This is my job.' The agent took away his camera, exposed all the film, and threw him out. (The exposed film is in the archive.) 'We've got our own man taking pictures,' the FBI agent said. The FBI photographer, who had clearance, was in the same quandary as Humes. He had never taken autopsy pictures before and was untrained in photographing gunshot wounds. The photographs of the body's interior were out of focus ... Before the President was buried, no one, either in Dallas or Washington, looked at both sides of the body, front and back, and realized that a bullet had entered the back and exited the throat ... .

Patrick C Wrote:"accurately and correctly analyze"

According to who...you Ben...?

Goodness me, this was the murder of a US president.....!

One can only imagine what rules were broken on that day and that weekend ....not suspicious at all IMO....

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:accurately and correctly analyze

According to who...you Ben...?

Patrick C Wrote:Goodness me, this was the murder of a US president.....!

One can only imagine what rules were broken on that day and that weekend ....not suspicious at all IMO....

Ben Holmes Wrote:

Patrick C Wrote:Goodness me, this was the murder of a US president.....!

One can only imagine what rules were broken on that day and that weekend ....not suspicious at all IMO....

You'll refuse to name the Baden statement you're referring to... my crystal ball has spoken. :lol:

John McAdams Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:Dr. Baden, unfortunately, knows very little about this case. I invite knowledgeable people to critique this paragraph by Dr. Baden:

“The [autopsy] photographer was there, the corpsman who usually took pictures of damaged hearts and cirrhotic livers and other diseases. He was snapping away when he caught the attention of an FBI agent, who came up to him and asked for his clearance. ‘Clearance?’ said the corpsman. ‘This is my job.’ The agent took away his camera, exposed all the film, and threw him out. (The exposed film is in the archive.) ‘We’ve got our own man taking pictures,’ the FBI agent said. The FBI photographer, who had clearance, was in the same quandary as Humes. He had never taken autopsy pictures before and was untrained in photographing gunshot wounds. The photographs of the body’s interior were out of focus … Before the President was buried, no one, either in Dallas or Washington, looked at both sides of the body, front and back, and realized that a bullet had entered the back and exited the throat … ” – Michael Baden “Unnatural Death – Confessions of a Medical Examiner”, pg. 10-11

Now, although I’ve never been able to get a WCR Supporter to admit it, VIRTUALLY EVERY SINGLE SENTENCE IN THE ABOVE QUOTE IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG.

One sentence is an absolute lie.

Can anyone name the true statement… or the lie?

I don’t see any lies.

I don’t see any true statements either.

Baden was not there at the autopsy.

Ben Holmes Wrote:

John McAdams Wrote:Now, although I’ve never been able to get a WCR Supporter to admit it, VIRTUALLY EVERY SINGLE SENTENCE IN THE ABOVE QUOTE IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG.

One sentence is an absolute lie.

Can anyone name the true statement… or the lie?

I don’t see any lies.

John McAdams Wrote:You don’t seem to understand this.

If Baden had simply stuck with what he told the HSCA, and what the HSCA FPP concluded, that would have been perfectly consistent with LHO as the lone shooter.

So why should he change his story to convict Oswald?

You buffs are so addicted to calling everybody you disagree with “liar” that you can’t admit that sometimes people just make mistakes.

Did you not notice that nothing the the paragraph quoted above is something of which Baden had first hand knowledge?

And nothing in it has anything to do with the natures of the wounds?

You have fallen into the trap typical of buffs here. You are keen to shout “liar, liar!” at people who disagree with you.

Dale Hayes Wrote:Does MM REALLY expect sane readers to prefer HIS ignorant opinion over the findings of Dr. Baden? Has he sunk that low? I think he has. MM, you have taken leave of your senses and lost touch with reality. To make it worse, you are as obnoxious as hell. The irony is almost impossible to believe: I am labeled gullible and arrogant while this foolish idiot pronounces his unqualified, utterly amateurish opinions to be superior to Dr. Baden's. If MM is married, I feel sorry for his poor wife.

Dr. Baden Wrote:The [autopsy] photographer was there, the corpsman who usually took pictures of damaged hearts and cirrhotic livers and other diseases. He was snapping away when he caught the attention of an FBI agent, who came up to him and asked for his clearance. ‘Clearance?’ said the corpsman. ‘This is my job.’ The agent took away his camera, exposed all the film, and threw him out. (The exposed film is in the archive.) ‘We’ve got our own man taking pictures,’ the FBI agent said. The FBI photographer, who had clearance, was in the same quandary as Humes. He had never taken autopsy pictures before and was untrained in photographing gunshot wounds. The photographs of the body’s interior were out of focus … Before the President was buried, no one, either in Dallas or Washington, looked at both sides of the body, front and back, and realized that a bullet had entered the back and exited the throat …

John McAdams Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:You cannot ‘misremember’ and describe what it’s never been possible for you to have seen.

Nonsense. False memories are quite common.

But in Baden’s case, he was not there at the autopsy, so it’s not a “memory” issue. It’s a “use of sources” issue.