+- Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com)
+-- Forum: Main JFK Forums (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-Main-JFK-Forums)
+--- Forum: JFK Conspiracy Main Forum (http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Forum-JFK-Conspiracy-Main-Forum)
+--- Thread: 20 Forensic Experts? (/Thread-20-Forensic-Experts)
20 Forensic Experts? - Ben Holmes - 05-31-2016
Dale Hayes says: "Every forensic expert to review this case validated the WC's official conclusion - unanimously. That fact alone renders these claims to be silly and unfounded. 20 experts - ALL of them agreed. INDEPENDENT experts at that."
What Dale Hayes doesn't say:
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the Autopsy did not dissect, and DID NOT KNOW about the bullet wound in JFK's throat.
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the bullet wound *LOOKED* like an entry.
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the prosectors were ORDERED not to dissect the track of the bullet.
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" even knew that the HSCA had intentionally lied about the testimony of the Bethesda witnesses - indeed, THEY NEVER HEARD THAT TESTIMONY. The HSCA kept the very evidence needed by the "experts" to make an honest appraisal.
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the Parkland staff CHANGED their "opinion" AFTER that weekend...
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the ONLY medically trained personnel to examine, however briefly, the bullet wound in JFK's throat were at Parkland.
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that "ragged" holds no place in the description of the original bullet wound in the skin of JFK's throat.
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that they've never seen the photograph showing bruising of the apical portion of the lung.
Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the executive session of the Warren Commission on Jan. 27 mentioned an autopsy report in which the throat wound was described as being caused by a fragment of bone.
You can't cite even ONE of these anonymous "experts" contradicting anything I've stated in this post - nor will you even try.
Indeed, Dale cannot even NAME these "20 forensic experts," and describe anything about them, such as their qualifications... Dale merely asserts, and everyone is expected to agree.