[Patrick C]

Ben Holmes Wrote:Nor is it "reasonable" to presume that his hands would have more evidence than his cheeks - that's merely a speculation on your part,

I disagree, I think it entirely reasonable to suggest (not presume) that we might expect residue on Oswald's hands because they had come into more contact with guns and bullets on that day more so than his face.

Entirely reasonable. You just won't see it because you can't entertain the idea for a second that Oswald was a lone assassin so you look for every excuse you can find to defend your belief in the JFK conspiracy fairy tale.