[Ben Holmes]

(08-02-2016, 09:32 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  Come on. You've realized, to your horror no doubt, that there's no objective support for your Chaney theory, so you're desperately trying to turn this into a discussion about pixels. How pathetic.

How silly... YOU and Patrick both admit that Chaney was closer to Altgens than the other cops. That's evidence for the fact that Chaney is right where you see him in the photo.

You've offered nothing more than your speculation that he wasn't.

Proven wrong on pixel issue, you're relegated to false complaints of a lack of "objective support" - even though YOU agree that the evidence shows him closer.

And when I invited you to show where Chaney spoke with Curry... dead silence.

These two issues are only a couple of bits of evidence for alteration in the extant Z-film.

And you've been unable to refute it.

And now that I've produced a photo DEMONSTRATING what I've been saying all along about the measurement of pixels in JPEGS - you've suddenly turned silent about the possibility of accurate measurement...

Embarrassing, isn't it?