[Ben Holmes]

(08-03-2016, 11:26 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(08-01-2016, 05:32 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-01-2016, 03:46 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  McAdams categorises the rail road tracks as "Knoll" - well based on for example - see statement from Danny Arce.

"It's taken DAYS of posts just to get you to admit the basic facts... facts that prove that your "opinion" is wrong."

It may take days ...my prerogative. I am not that active these days with the JFK case.

So what you are saying is that McAdams does not always throw the frontal shots as Knoll - fair enough, I did not check them all.

Then why did you claim (and STILL not retract) that McAdams' tabulation is "unassailable?"

YOU LIED, AND RIGHT NOW, YOU KNOW IT WAS A LIE.

(08-03-2016, 11:26 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  I don't really care.

Of course you don't... the truth isn't all that important to you. This really isn't some great revelation.

(08-03-2016, 11:26 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  He does however categorise the locations accurately in terms of the statistical reliability in the data - and that is the point. So what if there are a few outliers there.

YOU'RE LYING AGAIN, PATRICK.

You cannot admit that I've proven that McAdams took out provable witnesses of the "knoll location" - then claim that he was still accurate statistically.

IT'S NOT EVEN POSSIBLE!!

(08-03-2016, 11:26 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  What is important is that the majority of people thought ALL the shots came from the Knoll area or the TSBD area. And you know what that means.

I know what you keep attempting to speculate - but I've refuted it time and time again.

The explanation that shots came from BOTH locations explains this fact as well, and indeed, better... particularly considering the rest of the evidence.

(08-03-2016, 11:26 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  If I misrepresented a fraction of a % of the data - I really don't care. My point still stands. That you have a seemingly OCD for irrelevant minutia is your problem.

You don't even care when you're proven wrong... when it's proven that you're lying. I get that. Many might label that a character flaw.

Now that you've been proven wrong on one person, are you ready to move on to the next person?

The answer is quite obviously "no" - because you'd be seriously embarrassed each time I PROVED you to be wrong... and it would take days or weeks for each one... due to your extreme cowardice.

(08-03-2016, 11:26 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  Maybe that is the reason you can't see the wood from the trees...? The glaring reality that Oswald acting alone, shot JFK and Tippit.

Speculation will not overcome the evidence... only evidence can do that.