[Mark Ulrik]

(08-04-2016, 04:40 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-04-2016, 04:22 PM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-04-2016, 09:36 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-03-2016, 03:20 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Why are you so afraid to check Mark Lane's actual citations?

Time to do what I promised... Mark - you're lying.

You cannot document your claim that Mark Lane lied... and clearly, you're afraid to do so.

You're LYING, Ben Holmes, when you claim that I didn't check Lane's citations.

He cited Decker Ex 5323 and CE 2003, and I gave you 4 TSBD witnesses (Brennan, Euins, Hester, Piper) from the Decker Ex and one (Reid) from the CE. That's 5 non-GK witnesses (and just the most obvious ones). Lane claimed there were 22 GK witnesses and only 3 non-GK witnesses. He probably didn't expect  his readers to bother to check.

Now that you have been proved wrong, I expect a retraction/apology from you. Make it a good one.

And, of course, you've still refused to actually list the witnesses that Mark Lane cited.

Ad hominem will not replace that fact.

No retraction of the truth is ever needed...

The obvious truth here is that Lane's numbers were wrong, which I demonstrated and you keep lying about.

If this were actually true, then you'd simply list the people in the citations given by Mark Lane.

I both CITED and QUOTED five TSBD witnesses from Lane's own sources. He claimed there were only three non-GK witnesses. How can you not understand this?

Yet you continue to refuse to do so.

Why should I waste my time? Five TSBD witnesses are more than enough to demonstrate that Lane's numbers are wrong.

Nor are you allowed to label someone a liar without CITING the evidence that they are in conflict with.

But you're allowed to randomly attack me and call me a liar? Even though I both CITED and QUOTED from the sources cited by Lane, you accused me of not having checked them. Unbelievable.

Future assertions of that type will simply be deleted.

You can start by deleting your false accusations about me. An apology would also be nice.

My comments in green above.