[Ben Holmes]

(08-09-2016, 11:05 AM)Mark Ulrik Wrote:  

(08-07-2016, 06:38 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Of course:

Mark Ulrik Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:I keep pointing out supportable facts & evidence, and you keep offering speculation. All of your diagrams ABSOLUTELY RELY on an asserted distance of Altgens from the limo - yet you can't offer anything other than speculation & opinion for that.

What asserted distance? You're not making sense.

xxx
Your dishonesty is absolutely breathtaking. That's not me "admitting" anything. It's me asking what the heck you mean by asserted distance. Asserted by whom? What you see in the diagram is an estimated location based on where the sight lines meet.

Now, state for the record that you DO understand that Chaney's shadow, had he been right alongside JFK - WOULD NOT BE VISIBLE AT ALL IF ALTGENS WERE ALONGSIDE THE PRESIDENTIAL LIMO. And likewise, if Altgens had been 100 feet in front of the limo, Chaney's shadow would be plainly visible if he was just making the turn on to Elm street.

Sure. If you'll state for the record that you understand that Altgens was in Dallas on the 11/22/63.

Altgens' distance from the limo is ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL to your imagined "sightlines" - and the fact that you refuse to admit this simple fact simply shows either your ignorance of basic geometry, or an inherent dishonesty... take your pick.

You forgot the obvious third Yoption.

Well... you've lost this one, Mark.

You simply don't have the honesty to admit that the distance from Altgens to the Limo is ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL to your "sightlines".

But despite your refusal to admit it... it's still a fact.

And one that you cannot possibly refute.