[Patrick C]

(09-06-2016, 11:54 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  "Such as your lie about Majerus refuting Mark Lane on a topic he never mentioned in his book..."

Again, you seem to have an English comprehension problem.

Mike Majerus did not refute Mark Lane on that topic.

I merely stated that Mike Majerus makes the simple point that initially more people thought there were only two shots than now on record because they changed their minds due to media reports.

This is an important point - and his theory may be correct in terms of what actually happened. The strength of his argument of course is that Oswald took 5 to 6 seconds to get off the two shots that struck and not three shots as widely proposed by conspiracy theorists and frankly many lone gunman supporters.

In fact the WC favoured the three shot / 5.5 second approx scenario - a huge gaff in my opinion.

Had they taken a stronger stance on the other possible scenarios we would not have had years and years of doubt and we lone gunman supporters would not have to put up with day dreaming conspiracy fantasists like you, Mr Healy and Mr Abbot who frankly live in fairy tale land with this open and shut case.