[Ben Holmes]

(09-10-2016, 12:21 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:You'll NEVER produce even a single example, QUOTED; of my "appalling logic". I seem to recall asking you to do so the last time you lied on this topic...

Are you kidding, a significant number of your posts show flawed logic. There are hundreds of them. Can I be bothered to look for them....NOPE.

Then you're quite the dishonest yellow coward, aren't you?

Making ad hominem attacks that you cannot support even in the slightest.

You are, in other words, simply spouting your opinion as fact. And refusing anyone the opportunity to debate it.

My opinion, of course, is that you simply fail to understand simple logic, and that failure shows itself in your complaints about my "logic". You dare not offer any examples, because you're afraid that I can show quite easily that the internal logic of my statements is clear and obvious, and you simply don't understand.

And my opinion is supported by the FACT that you refuse to offer any examples of my "appalling logic".

So much for your vaunted education & honesty, eh Patrick?

 

(09-10-2016, 12:21 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:You were a "fomer" teacher? Did your students get marked down for poor spelling?

Yes I taught biology and chemistry at A Level (UK exams for 18 year olds) and Oxford and Cambridge entrance exams.

Probably not, biochemisty, genetics and natural sciences don't really focus on spelling.

Your near constant problems with spelling are quite amusing from someone claiming an advanced level of education. You're rapidly getting to the point where you can't make even one post without spelling errors.
 

(09-10-2016, 12:21 PM)Patrick C Wrote:   

Ben Holmes Wrote:I think I'll simply allow my words to demonstrate my level of education...

Oh yes certainly - your words demosntrate very well your level of education....enough said.

Your words certainly "demosntrate" very well your level of education... as do mine. You don't even seem embarrassed about your poor spelling.

Something I generally ignore, but when the person with poor spelling is the one making grandiose claims of his higher educational level - then it certainly becomes a fair target.

I really begin to wonder why you post here... you rarely debate the evidence, and when you do, you lie about it.

You prove quite helpless in defending the Warren Commission's theory against anyone as knowledgeable as you in the case evidence, yet you keep pretending to try... why is that, Patrick?