[Ben Holmes]

(09-14-2016, 05:43 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:And yet, despite over 400 direct quotes from Mark Lane, you've been rather totally unable to respond and refute anything he's been quoted saying. Why is that, Patrick?

Just had a quick look at some posts...I am aiming to limit the time to maybe an hour per week.....

So the answer is I cannot be bothered and I am not really that interested.

What I find very odd is that you are digging out old Amazon posts and responding to them here.......

Let's examine this theory you're putting forth...

If you respond to a post, even if you've not actually answered anything... then that post is now forever 'done with' - and cannot be brought up again.

I have a different theory... mine is that until you answer HONESTLY AND CREDIBLY - I don't see any problem at all in bringing up what you certainly think of as 'old' material.

If you think that you've answered the points I raise, THEN SIMPLY CUT & PASTE YOUR PREVIOUS REPLY.

You evidently believe it's okay to lie, then refuse to retract or support that lie... let me explain this to you - honest people find fault with that position.

You blatantly lied and claimed that I'd put forth a "7 shot, 5 shooter scenario with mobile film lab and metal detector team for all those missed bullets....." But you certainly know by now that you were intentionally lying, because you've NEVER cited any such claim.

You want to keep insisting that you're an honest man - yet you keep refusing to deal with the proof that you're a liar.

Why is that, Patrick?

Too busy?