[Ben Holmes]

(09-20-2016, 07:38 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  What I will say is Noel Twyman's book is an absolute pile of CRAP....and should have been entiteld Bloody Tripe.....

Amazon.com one star for effort review.....my review here:

Quote:As this book has now been released on Kindle, I am delighted to see that the bookseller who is asking $460 + for this pile of rubbish will likely never get his asking price.

Now to the book - I purchased a hard back copy of the book on a trip to the US when it first came out. Its a very polished publication in appearance only. The content is worthy of very little serious consideration and it is disturbing to read such positive reviews of the work.

Zapruder film alteration is central to this books message.

First of all the fact is that the Zapruder film is one of biggest reasons why a large majority of the general public believe Kennedy was shot from the front! Clearly forgers would have desired the exact opposite. Of course people who study ballistics and wound ballistics understand that real bodies barely move when struck by bullets and do not move in the way that Hollywood would have us believe.

David Wrone a renowned expert on the Zapruder film has stated that the film has not been tampered with - and as far as I know he believes in a conspiracy. Robert Groden - an extremely Pro Conspiracy propagandist also believes that the Zapruder film has not been altered.

Clearly as Zapruder and his partner Irwin Schwartz had the film in their possession to the point when the first 3 copies were made - this RULES out any possible opportunity to change the film. And also note that the Nix film matches perfectly the Zapruder film where the capture the same time line. And it goes without saying that altering the Zapruder film RISKING the chance that another film could have been taken on that day - which would then SHOW that the Z film had been altered would draw massive attention to the problem and put any conspirators under the spot light.

Its worth reading to understand how not to write a book on the JFK case.

Interestingly, you refused to tell the truth about Wrone's lying ... why is that?

You give a poor review of the book, AND FAIL COMPLETELY TO MENTION THE OUTRIGHT LIES CONCERNING Z-FILM ALTERATION... why is that, Patrick?

Perhaps you simply avoid the facts because you prefer to believe Wrone when he's telling these blatant lies...

But the fact that you cannot agree that he was dishonest here simply shows your dishonesty.