[Ben Holmes]

(10-09-2016, 11:54 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Which part of "I am not really interested in debating the case with you" do you not understand?

Why should I waste my time citing DVP and Hank when all people need to do is go to Amazon and look at the JFK discussions I to V  to see you get you ass kicked.....?

I am indeed an honest man Ben. That you think everyone who thinks JFK was shot by the lone assassin LHO is not, speaks volumes about your capacity for understanding the concept of disagreement.

Cheerio until maybe next week.....

I see you are getting a lot of posts.......or not as the case may be.....

More excuses... more proof of your cowardice.

Indeed, more proof that you're a liar, because you simply cannot quote any examples that support your claims. Ad hominem is all you have, and that's a severe limitation in a forum that discusses the evidence.

The only reasonable explanation for why Stombaugh's examination of the front of JFK's shirt went unquestioned is that the Warren Commission didn't WANT such testimony.

The only reasonable explanation for why his report disappeared is that it conflicted with the Warren Commission. It's couldn't have been because Stombaugh found no bullet metal fragments in the front of the shirt (the FBI admitted as much), so it must have been that Stombaugh stated in his report that the 'slit' was caused by a scalpel, and not a bullet.

And since you, Patrick, refuse to offer any other credible explanation - you lose.