Posts: 83
Threads:6
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance Critic
RE: Henry Sienzant Demonstrates How To Lie...
(10-11-2016, 01:31 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: Henry Sienzant Wrote:Ben Holmes Wrote:Quote:No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building." (WCR 61)
Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America does accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply lying. ...
Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as you claim.
You're lying again, Henry.
More importantly, you KNOW you're lying.
Tell us, why do you think that you can support your belief with lies?
Henry has never admitted his lie, nor retracted it. Notice how subtle the lie is... with the addition of only a single word, "all" - Henry has transformed a perfectly accurate and correct statement into something he can "refute".
Patrick goes further than Henry... Patrick will simply make things up... not with the addition of a mere word, but entire sentences...
This is what believers need to do to argue the evidence.
Lie about it.
In fairness, Mr. Hankie is really a baseball expert and knows very lillte about Dallas. Recently, for example, he felt it was necessary to announce a base on balls with the bases loaded counts as an RBI for the batter.... I'd guess that everyone over 10 knows that, other than Mr. Hankie's loyal folowers of Dale, De Bozo, Mogul and similar simpletons.
This post was last modified: 10-11-2016, 06:22 PM by
Lee Abbott.