[Patrick C]

(10-14-2016, 02:06 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(10-14-2016, 11:46 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  Well we know from Buell that Oswald told him curtain rods were in the package....so in fact we do know there was a package and Oswald stated they were curtain rods.

Nope... we do not "know" this...

You are certainly aware of the fact that for a time, Frazier was treated as a suspect in the murder... was hauled in and put through a lie detector test, and had his own rifle confiscated.

You've completely ignored the fact that there WERE curtain rods involved in this case... THIS IS A PROVABLE FACT.

One that you need to account for.
 

(10-14-2016, 11:46 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  I have always found it rather odd that he would need to make a paper bag to carry curtain rods. Why would you need a bag...? Just carry the rod or rods loose The window was pretty small - I have actually been in his bedroom at N. Beckley - 1983.

Silly speculation like this doesn't change the fact that there WERE curtain rods involved in this case... curtain rods that you've not publicly acknowledged, and have NEVER explained.

(10-14-2016, 11:46 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  That Oswald carried a rifle into work that morning is almost a given, as is that he is the lone assassin.

Again, mere speculation on your part... still evading the fact that curtain rods are still in this case, and unexplained by you.

(10-14-2016, 11:46 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  As for Bugliosi - he is not the final word on the assassination. His work is highly persuasive that Oswald acted alone, but it is not and nor should be considered perfect.

He either told the truth, or he lied.

He was either "persuasive" - or he spouted nonsense.

It's looking like you're going to have a very hard time defending him... you'd better call David Von Pein, and ask him for help... since he's the acknowledged Bugliosi fan on the Internet.

Ben Holmes Wrote:He was either "persuasive" - or he spouted nonsense.

What a ridiculous suggestion.

So you think he spouted 1600 pages of nonsense over a period of 20+ years of research and writing......as a succesful attorney with a fine track record........

He wrote one of the most emphatic books ever written on the assassination. Period. He does not need any defending and if he were here to debate with you Holmes, he would run rings around you.