Posts: 955
Threads:276
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
35
Stance Critic
RE: Where's The Evidence For The SBT?
(10-19-2016, 01:08 PM)Ray Mitcham Wrote: (10-04-2016, 03:14 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: (10-04-2016, 02:55 PM)Patrick C Wrote: (10-04-2016, 01:49 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: An ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT for non-conspiracy is that the SBT is true. The SBT requires that a bullet went completely through JFK's body, ie; 'transit'.
The evidence suggests the opposite.
1. The depth of the wound.
2. The location of the wound.
3. The missing interior chest photo.
4. The original description of the throat wound.
5. The original autopsy describing a different explanation for the throat wound. (Rankin)
6. The size of the wound in comparison to it's supposed "exit".
7. The complete lack of any metal found on the front of the shirt & tie.
8. The missing report & testimony of Stombaugh.
9. The earliest attempts to explain the frontal shot (Life Magazine, Mandel's article)
As Wendy's used to say with their "Where's the beef?" advertising campaign... I'd like to quiz: "Where's the EVIDENCE?"
And demonstrating that they have none - watch for the dead silence following this post...
You mean the SBF....Single Bullet Fact......
Yep... no evidence.
Why the cowardice, Patrick? Can't you make a reasoned explanation that refutes what I said?
I agree with Patrick. It's the SBF ----Single Bullet Fib.
Patrick has refused to offer the evidence for his theory, as I did above. Critics have no problems offering the actual evidence -
BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY.
I daresay that believers
dream of the time a decade or two ago, when they could ride roughshod over critics due to the fact that so much evidence was still concealed by the government.