Posts: 450
Threads:11
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance WCR Supporter
RE: Malcolm Kilduff interview from 1991
Are you for real....?
I mean can you not read...?
Ben Holmes Wrote:You're now finally admitting what I've been stating all along... that it was Dr. Burkley, and NOT KILDUFF VIEWING THE WOUNDS, NOR DR. PERRY, NOR ANY OTHER FALSE CLAIM.
NO I AM NOT saying anything of the sort.
What I said was Kilduff stated Dr Burkley was the source on Nov 22 and then in 1991 in an interview that it was Dr. Perry who was the source. Period. That you cannot understand that, makes you appear frankly stupid.
I have also stated in my opinion that it does not matter which doctor told Kilduff that Kennedy was dead from a bullet to the head. I also stated that one could reasonably assume that the protocol would be to refer to the president's personal physician as the source of all medical statements on the presidents condition even if he was actually not.
I have also stated that he may have been informed by more than one doctor that Kennedy was dead and that we may not know the chronological sequence on that information being passed to Kilduff.
That you have twisted the above into something of your own illogical making accusing me of lying simply re-enforces my assertion that you are dumb - and that is being polite.
This post was last modified: 10-29-2016, 04:55 PM by
Ben Holmes.