Posts: 450
Threads:11
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance WCR Supporter
RE: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #16 Refuted.
Bugliosi refers only to 16 warehousemen and not all the employees of the TSBD.
Your list refers to some non warehouse staff and women leaving prossibly 5 males of which Givens is one. That leaves 4 toward the end of the list who could have been warehousemen.
If they were not - Bugliosis is correct. If one or more were, then he is wrong. I do not have the time to check.
Who cares anyway Holmes....Bugliosi makes an OUTSTANDING case for Oswald's guilt. Far better than yours which is a damp squib by comparison.
Quote:16. After the shooting in Dealey Plaza, nearly all of the sixteen warehousemen who worked in the Depository Building returned to the building and were present at a roll call of employees. Only Lee Harvey Oswald and Charles Givens were not present; Givens was located shortly thereafter.49 So only Oswald left the building and was unaccounted for. Dallas Morning News reporter Kent Biffle, who was inside the Depository Building, wrote in his journal that day, “I listened as the building superintendent [Roy Truly] told detectives about Lee Oswald failing to show up at a roll call. My impression is that there was an earlier roll call that had been inconclusive because several employees were missing. This time, however, all were accounted for but Oswald.
This post was last modified: 11-16-2016, 03:10 PM by
Ben Holmes.