Posts: 955
Threads:276
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
35
Stance Critic
RE: JFK's Head Wound Location
It's truly amusing to see the cowardice of believers in action.
Patrick has lost this debate - despite his refusal to even get into details... and clearly, he knows it.
When McAdams stated "You folks need a wound with blown out occipital bone. Just saying "rear" or "occipital-parietal" or "occipital region" doesn't get it for you." - he was simply lying.
No believer can give a more precise description of a wound to the BACK of the head than the one given by virtually everyone - INCLUDING the autopsy prosectors...
Even Patrick finally admitted that 'occipital' and 'parietal' are valid descriptions of a wound to the BACK of the head.
McAdams will never directly debate me unless he controls the format - to include the ability to censor anything I say... so only Patrick has tried to defend McAdam's lie...
And failed...