Posts: 955
Threads:276
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
35
Stance Critic
RE: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #23 Refuted.
(12-15-2016, 09:26 PM)Lee Abbott Wrote: With arguments like that, no wonder "Reclaiming History" was an epic of nonsense Dale H. Hazy, Jr. believed.
Indeed.
Believers simply cannot defend the nonsense that Bugliosi spouted in his desperate defense of the Warren Commission.
As anyone who's followed Patrick's attempts can see - it simply cannot be done. Believers are forced to show their cowardice, because they simply aren't honest enough to admit that the majority of these arguments are downright silly.
Take, for example - Bugliosi's claim that since Oswald wasn't seen by one particular witness reading a newspaper that day (despite, of course, that he HAD originally said that Oswald was reading a newspaper!!) - that he must be guilty of murder.
Or, as in this argument, that because he changed clothes after work, he's a murderer.
Patrick knows he cannot defend these silly assertions, and he's too dishonest to decry them for the nonsense that they are...