[Fendlesworth]

(01-01-2017, 12:40 AM)Ben Holmes Wrote:   

Quote:You tried to explain why there's no apparent slowdown in the Zapruder film.

No I didn't. Go back and read what I had written. I clearly state that the Limo slowed down, and probably slowed down more that what the average viewer may percieve.

Quote:This fact simply cannot explain the lack of a slowdown being seen in the extant Zapruder film. It's much like arguing that the limo was heavier due to it's speed, and while precisely true, means absolutely nothing.

Ditto with your "explanation" of why the limo's speed wasn't visible in the Zapruder film.

I'm sorry Ben, I just don't know how to respond to this. This comment is just silly.

There is slowdown evident in the Zapruer film Ben, and your analogy is not accurate at all.

Quote:...where you raise the suspicion of alteration, then spend the rest of the post refuting it.

Um, no. I am not refuting that. I am just merely pointing out the slight speed distortion evident in the changing angle. This is something to consider. The Zapruder Film could be altered, or this could be just another disinformation rabbit-hole like Badgeman.
The fact that it can be synchronized with the Nix and Muchmore Films makes one wonder if frames were removed at all, or that all three Films were altered. These both should be considered in my opinion.
One could easily turn the speeds into real numbers and graphs and compare them. 

Quote:Have you ever filmed a passing train within a span of a few hundred feet, and noted that it's speed wasn't consistent with what was seen with the naked eye?

No I havent. But looking that the train traveling at a constant speed, the apparent speed can change. Would you not agreee that the train appears to be travelling faster when it is two feet away at 0 degrees that when it is 600 ft away at 60 degrees?
It's not that the Zaparuder Film shows less speed, it is that the Zapruder film has an apparent speed differential because of the perspective, and when the maximum apparent speed was supposed to be at the maximum (orthogonal), the Limo was actually at it's lowest true speed. 
If you don't want to understand this and keep misframing my posts in the most ridiculous fashion, than whatever.

Quote:I don't. Nor have I stated that I did... yet you imply that I have... why is that?

You said "most people would agree you", or that "most people would agree that I haven't made a point" or some arrogantly disparaging crap like that a few posts ago.

You confidently asserted what most people would think about my post.