David Von Pein Wrote: (01-18-2017, 03:30 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: David Von Pein Wrote:What caused the bullet hole in JFK's throat then? And where did that bullet go? And why wasn't it in JFK's body at autopsy? Take your time.
Takes no time at all for a knowledgeable critic.
The wound in JFK's throat was exactly what the doctors who saw it originally thought... an entry wound. That bullet ranged downward toward JFK's chest.
It wasn't in JFK's body at the autopsy because it was pulled out in the pre-autopsy autopsy that took place between 6:40 and 8:00pm.
See?
No time at all needed to answer David's questions.
This is why he's too much the coward to post here... he knows that there's absolutely NOTHING he can post that I can't answer in a reasonable, credible way, AND SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE.
Please note the multiple lies uttered by Ben Holmes above:
Ben thinks that this statement....
>>> "That bullet ranged downward toward JFK's chest." <<<
...is "SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE" in this case. Of course Ben is lying, because such a desperate theory put forth by Benji is most certainly NOT supported by the "evidence" in this case at all. There is NO evidence that any bullet "ranged downward toward JFK's chest". None. Ben is engaging in nothing but blatant speculation and wishful thinking, and nothing more. (As per usual.)
So you're calling Kemp Clark, one of the doctors in attendance, a liar?
On the 27th of November, the New York Times reported "Dr. Kemp Clark, who pronounced Mr. Kennedy dead, said one bullet struck him at about the necktie knot, "It ranged downward in his chest and did not exit" the surgeon said.
On that same day the New York Herald Tribune stated: "on the basis of accumulated data, investigators have concluded that the first shot fired as the Presidential car was approaching, struck the President in the neck, just above the knot of his necktie, then ranged downward into his body."
CBS, NBC, the BBC, and L'Express quoted Dr. Clark as saying that the bullet had entered Kennedy's neck from in front and entered the chest.
But perhaps all of these don't strike you as "evidence" - so let's look at what is PROVABLY evidence - sworn testimony:
Dr. Clark: Dr. Perry assumed that the findings in the neck were due to penetration of the missile into the chest. For this reason, he requested chest tubes to be placed. (6H28)
Dr. Clark: ... It was the assumption, based on the previously described deviation of the trachea and the presence of blood in the strap muscles of the neck that a wound or missile wound might have entered the President's chest. (6H28)
So who's lying, David?
I'd like you to PUBLICLY RETRACT your lie that there's no evidence for the bullet ranging downward into JFK's chest.
Of course, knowing how dishonest you are, this rebuttal and your retraction will never find it's way on to your many websites...