Posts: 450
Threads:11
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance WCR Supporter
RE: Single Bullet "Fact?"
(01-17-2017, 03:21 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: 'Vincent Bugliosi Wrote:"With respect to the second shot fired in Dealey Plaza, the "single-bullet THEORY" is an obvious misnomer. Though in its incipient stages it was but a theory, the indisputable evidence is that it is now a proven FACT, a wholly supported conclusion. .... And no sensible mind that is also informed can plausibly make the case that the bullet that struck President Kennedy in the upper right part of his back did not go on to hit Governor Connally." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Pages 489-490 of "Reclaiming History"
If the SBT is a "Fact" - why is it that no believer dares to try to defend it against a knowledgeable critic?
It's a FACT that the prosectors could not trace ANY PATH AT ALL through the body.
It's a FACT that this theory didn't even come into existence until Tague forced a revision of the "Three shots, three hits" theory.
It's a FACT that without the SBT, conspiracy is the only other explanation... one that explains other facts as well...
Why aren't their any believers brave enough to dispute these facts?
(01-17-2017, 03:21 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: If the SBT is a "Fact" - why is it that no believer dares to try to defend it against a knowledgeable critic?
I have done that for years, so has DVP and so has Hank and many authors. You are talking nonsense again.
(01-17-2017, 03:21 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: It's a FACT that the prosectors could not trace ANY PATH AT ALL through the body.
So what, they did not know the anterior neck wound was a bullet wound and muscles contract during mortis.
(01-17-2017, 03:21 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: It's a FACT that this theory didn't even come into existence until Tague forced a revision of the "Three shots, three hits" theory.
So what...? However, it should have done, because it is obvious from the film that the men are hit together, so they should have considered a one shot scenario for the non fatal wounds.
(01-17-2017, 03:21 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: It's a FACT that without the SBT, conspiracy is the only other explanation... one that explains other facts as well...
The SBT is THE MOST PLAUSIBLE and likely of the shooting scenarios. Period.
(01-17-2017, 03:21 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: Why aren't their any believers brave enough to dispute these facts?
There are and have been for years. It seems you choose to ignore them. I am totally confident you would get your ass kicked on the SBT in a public debate.
The SBT is so obviously the historical truth it should be known as the SBF as I have stated many times.
This post was last modified: 02-08-2017, 03:21 PM by
Ben Holmes.