[Patrick C]

(02-08-2017, 05:16 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(02-08-2017, 04:02 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(02-08-2017, 03:05 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(02-08-2017, 12:55 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(01-30-2017, 12:38 AM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Dr. Gregory worked on Connally's wrist, and gave five reasons that the bullet that went through Connally's wrist did so from the outside to the palm side.

1. The general ragged appearance of the dorsal wound is typical of an entrance wound.

2. Bits of thread and cloth were carried into the wound on the dorsal side and these corresponded with a tear in the jacket sleeve.

3. Two or three fragments were shed after the bullet had hit the radius. The three fragments taken from the wrist were more volar and caused by the radius flaking them off.

4. The distortion of the soft tissues shows the pathway to be dorsal to volar.

5. Air in the wound is more visible on the dorsal side of the X-ray which is typical of entrance wound.

It's not a surprise that believers absolutely REFUSE to debate this issue, or to explain it away...

But it demonstrates that the SBT is just a bunch of hooey...

(Watch as believers assert that they can't understand this, or simply refuse to answer...)

The SBT supports the path through the wrist when the hand is palm down to the thigh. Hence the entrance is on the upper side of the wrist and the exit in the lower palm side of the wrist. This ties in with what Dr Gregory is saying. You must be assuming that Connally's wrist was oriented in such a way that the palm side faced his chest.......otherwise your argument does not make sense.......

And since we know FOR A FACT that Connally's hand was not oriented the way you claim... that it was no-where near his thigh, you've lost.

I'm not assuming Connally's wrist position - it's CERTAINLY not lying down on his thigh as you presuppose.

When the hand is chest level, it's virtually IMPOSSIBLE for a bullet exiting the chest to have a trajectory through the wrist as described by Dr. Gregory.

You lost!

 

(02-08-2017, 03:05 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  And since we know FOR A FACT that Connally's hand was not oriented the way you claim... that it was no-where near his thigh, you've lost.

Rubbish, you know no such thing. However there are plenty of photos showing JC holding his hat with his palm down.
 

(02-08-2017, 03:05 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  I'm not assuming Connally's wrist position - it's CERTAINLY not lying down on his thigh as you presuppose.

I am not saying that either - his wrist could have been raised and still palm down.
 

(02-08-2017, 03:05 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  When the hand is chest level, it's virtually IMPOSSIBLE for a bullet exiting the chest to have a trajectory through the wrist as described by Dr. Gregory.

Nonsense that is just tripe.

Unlike other forums, it's quite easy to post a photo showing how the wrist was turned palm down while holding his hat, in a credible position for the SBT to work.

I'm quite happy to help you post such a photo... but I know you'll never do so.

This is a frequent problem with believers, asserting something is one thing, proving it is a whole 'nuther kettle of fish.

If Patrick were an honest man, he could easily produce a photo showing someone holding a hat with an obvious trajectory that would go in the direction that Dr. Gregory pointed out.

Watch, as Patrick ABSOLUTELY REFUSES to document his claim.

John Connally spent nearly 30 years looking at his wrist - he died in June 1993. He knew the bullet entered the upper (or dorsal) part of his wrist and exited the palm side. It is quite simple.

The Z frames shown here on DVP's web site show the hat. If Connally were holding the hat with his palm facing upward, then the bullet would have had to have come from within the car. There is no debate.

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.co.uk/2015/...t-887.html