[Nick Principe]

(03-23-2017, 08:24 PM)Hollywood Wrote:  You are certainly welcome to attempt a refutation of the items comprising critical mass - I already raised it once. No mistake here, I assure you. Your response would no doubt be typical - hearsay, innuendo, quotes taken out of context to advance an agenda - it's boring.

I could, but I don't need to, because the onus is not on me to absolve Oswald. The burden is on YOU to prove no one helped him. Barring that the majority of the evidence is a decendant of a questionalbe broken chain, none of it proves that there *wasn't* a massive cover-up in Dallas that day. 

You are certainly welcome to attempt a refutation of the items comprising critical mass - the undamaged CE399, the Katzenbach memo, the passel of medical evidence, the third thoratic vertebrae, the 40+ witnesses who ran to the GK fence and stated they smelled gunpowder, an exploding frangible bullet, Howard Brennan's description of a man who in no way resembles Oswald, and the behaviour of the WC. Your response would no doubt be typical - hearsay, innuendo, quotes taken out of context to advance an agenda - it's boring.