Posts: 59
Threads:13
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
1
Stance Critic
RE: Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #37 Refuted.
(03-30-2017, 03:51 PM)Hollywood Wrote: (03-30-2017, 03:09 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:
Bugliosi and the WC BOTH laid out a most convincing case for LHO's guilt.
And therein lies the key problem, which funnily comes
straight from your own mouth. It was not the WC's job to lay out a case against LHO. Their job (officially) was to "investigate" the assassination. Yet the notion that it *might* have been someone other than LHO is never even broached. An investigation that refuses to entertain more than one theory, especially considering all the victim's enemies and their motives, is incompetent and irresponsible at best. Corrupt and complicit at worst.
Bugliosi, as the prosecuting attorney, is supposed to lay out a case for Oswald's guilt. Not the WC.