[Ben Holmes]

(05-06-2017, 01:59 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(03-07-2017, 04:23 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  (37) Oswald's prints were found on boxes that comprised the sniper's nest.

They would be *EXPECTED* to be there... he worked there. What should *NOT* be there are prints from an *UNKNOWN* person who didn't work there - and were never identified. Far from being evidence against Oswald, the fingerprint evidence instead shows that leads weren't followed up by the DPD & FBI. And although Bugliosi had nothing to do with it – this particular topic – the relative paucity of fingerprints on these boxes, led one Warren Commission Believer (Patrick Collins) to hypothesize that Oswald was moving the boxes with his forearms.

Yes, you read that right! His forearms. It truly takes a Believer to come up with these explanations...

What I actually said was Oswald could have pushed boxes already stacked up with his thighs or forearms exactly as I had done when helping some one move house some time before I made that post.

The fact is...the lone assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald used boxes already stacked high and he moves a few boxes around including the three propped up right by the window. His prints were on some of those boxes....

Interestingly - even though at some point those boxes HAD to have been moved to get to the 6th floor and near that window which was away from the elevators.....no other employee prints were found on them........so perhaps it is that cardboard does lend itself too well to prints......one has to consider.

All you've done, Patrick, is agree with what I stated.

What you CAN'T do is explain the other prints that were on the box in the sniper's nest.

For example, why is the Warren Commission completely silent on this evidence?