Ben Holmes Wrote:And if you admit that the wound was in the occipital-parietal - then all you need to do is explain what portion of the occipital isn't located at the back of the head.
The wound was "somewhat occipital and temporal" mainly parietal as describes at autopsy / report.
There is no conflict in that with a rear sourced head shot which produced the entry wound we see in the back of the head in the records.
However, nothing I say will make your change your mind on the ridiculous fairy tale that you believe in - the phantom Grassy Knoll Gunman.....so there is little if any point in responding to the fatal shot non issue.