[Garry Puffer]

Dex Olsen says:
Then by all means, R, please provide an example or 2.

R. Anderson says:
Probably the best one had to be his presentation of Egerter's testimony (in Part IV). Right off the bat he presented it as totally true and proving Oswald was CIA. Well, I guess he was counting on me not knowing it because when I pointed out she indeed specifically denied that he was CIA in her testimony (the part he *didn't* present)....he *then* started calling her a liar.

It was like that all the time with him. He did the same thing with Wilcott's testimony. It was up to me to point out the part where the very people questioning him blew a hole in his story.....and he had no real answer.

And really he had the same issue the rest of you seem to (no offense): no real knowledge of the real world and how things work. Just today AC tried to say courts don't admit evidence that have breaks in the chain....and as I pointed out: that just isn't so. Benny's deal was how supposedly air-tight military security is. (Hopefully names like Bradley Manning, Jonathan Pollard, Daniel Ellsberg, etc ring a few bells. In fact, the very fact we've heard of the so-called Roswell event is because officers involved (sworn to secrecy) wouldn't shut up about it.)

And really that's the tip of the iceberg......probably his best was his feeble defense of Mark Lane. He of course saw nothing underhanded in Lane's treatment of Brennan's eyesight in 'Rush to Judgment' (omitting the fact that Brennan's was in fact farsighted).

So if you haven't seen this stuff......you haven't been looking.
........................................................................................................................................

So, Ben, what say you? Somehow I feel Mr. Anderson might be leaving something out.