[Larry Hancock]

I suppose the book title has been a mixed blessing, originally I picked it because I frequently got asked just that same question. On the other hand I'm sure some passed it by because of that. Its been fun on a couple of occasions when radio hosts booked me assuming I would be anti-conspiracy and help poke fun at CT's. Some of those shows probably were a bit shorter than planned. The most fun was a British company that offered to sign me up to edit a collection of anti-conspiracy articles on JFK....that went south pretty quickly.

There is no doubt its risky going to sources rather than staying with harder evidence and I have to say I've chewed up a bunch of years writing off sources that seemed interesting at first....readers sometimes ask me about names they think are missing from SWHT and I have to say they are not really missing, I looked at them and if they are not in there it meant that I could not sufficiently vet them. I do try and give my vetting criteria at the beginning of the book. All in all their really are enough credible folks who talked to give us the general scenario, the interesting part is that those are the ones who never thought their remarks would go beyond family, friends - or their lawyers.