[Ben Holmes]

miker Wrote:

Quote:Accordingly, the Department of Justice has concluded that no
persuasive evidence can be identified to support the theory of a
conspiracy in either the assassination of President Kennedy or
the assassination of Dr. King. No further investigation appears
to be warranted in either matter unless new information which is
sufficient to support additional investigative activity becomes
available. While this report is intended to "close" the
Department's formal response to the Select Committee final
report, it is the Department's intention to continue to review
all correspondence and to investigate, as appropriate, any
potentially productive information.

Read the letter. It is self explanatory.

As far as the DOJ is concerned, they CLOSED the case because they did not believe there was any evidence of conspiracy.

That is actually the final word, unless they obtain new evidence. So I suggest you start focusing on the evidence.

Again, read the the letter.

The DOJ gets the final word.

I'm amused that you couldn't even quote my response, and respond to what I stated.

Your opinion that the DOJ can over-rule a Congressional Investigation is quite amusing indeed. Can you document any time that this happened in American History?

The DOJ closed their investigation - they had no power to change the conclusions of the Congressional investigation...

Can you explain why you refuse to address my refutation of your statements?

And can you explain why believers consistently refer back to the earliest investigation, despite the fact that there were several later investigations?