[Nick Principe]

If LNers had anything even mildly compelling to offer other than the tepid litany of "What Warren Said" there might be a modicum of hope in convincing anyone who knew anything about the case. As I've said before, everyone starts off knowing nothing, and works their way up. And almost everyone's opinion is slanted towards the "official" story...when they know nothing.

Here's what Lisa Pease said:

"The very first Warren Commission testimony I ever read was selected at random. Grabbed a volume at random, flipped to page at random, and was shocked to find Arlen Specter trying to put words in Dr. Perry’s mouth. Clearly, Perry believed Kennedy had been shot from in front. Clearly, Specter wasn’t going to let him go until he allowed that the shot “could” have come from behind. It was so shockingly dishonest I knew right then and there that not only had their been a cover-up, but that the media had not even bothered to read the evidence. It was so black and white."

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://jfkfacts.org/jfk-doctors-views-may-stir-parkland-debate/#comments">http://jfkfacts.org/jfk-doctors-views-m ... /#comments</a><!-- m -->