#67
Conspiracy JFK Forum
The Backyard Photos
Re: The Backyard Photos
I love how the LNers cite the conclusions of the WC and the HSCA to prove that the backyard photos are genuine, as if a government-endorsed panel is impartial and infallible.
I also love that they think a water spot is the reason for the straight line across the chin, where Oswald's face has been inserted above someone else's chin. A water spot in the same place on three separate photos! How stupid do you have to be to fall for that one?
From John G. Kays:
The two official investigations of the backyard photos were both rather shallow. The Warren Commission tried to do a reenactment of the scene, and left the head off in their print published in the Warren Report! Why did they do this?
Their main proof that the photos are genuine, is that the markings on the negatives were legitimately from the Imperial Reflex Camera. [The conspirators most likely] first built the composite in a sophisticated laboratory using a much better camera, then they photographed the photograph with the Imperial Reflex Camera, so that the negative would have matching forensics to the camera.
The House Select Committee on Assassinations, the second major investigatory body, conducted Pinrose Distance Statistics, where they would compare body measurements of known Oswald photos with the controversial shots of Lee in these suspicious poses. However, in their final report, they left out important statistical data, that did not jive [sic]. The essential chin measurements would have spoiled their report, so they were omitted!
http://thesop.org/story/movie/2009/05/09...xposed.php
Me:
So to simply cite the findings of these two panels is, to be kind, incredibly naive and misleading.
FBI backyard recreation.jpg (Size: 41.05 KB / Downloads: 144)
I also love that they think a water spot is the reason for the straight line across the chin, where Oswald's face has been inserted above someone else's chin. A water spot in the same place on three separate photos! How stupid do you have to be to fall for that one?
From John G. Kays:
The two official investigations of the backyard photos were both rather shallow. The Warren Commission tried to do a reenactment of the scene, and left the head off in their print published in the Warren Report! Why did they do this?
Their main proof that the photos are genuine, is that the markings on the negatives were legitimately from the Imperial Reflex Camera. [The conspirators most likely] first built the composite in a sophisticated laboratory using a much better camera, then they photographed the photograph with the Imperial Reflex Camera, so that the negative would have matching forensics to the camera.
The House Select Committee on Assassinations, the second major investigatory body, conducted Pinrose Distance Statistics, where they would compare body measurements of known Oswald photos with the controversial shots of Lee in these suspicious poses. However, in their final report, they left out important statistical data, that did not jive [sic]. The essential chin measurements would have spoiled their report, so they were omitted!
http://thesop.org/story/movie/2009/05/09...xposed.php
Me:
So to simply cite the findings of these two panels is, to be kind, incredibly naive and misleading.
FBI backyard recreation.jpg (Size: 41.05 KB / Downloads: 144)
| Messages In This Thread |
Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)