[Ben Holmes]

R. Anderson Wrote:Again: if that's all there was to it.....he would not have insisted on immunity from prosecution for perjury before turning over that tape.

It's really that simple. This is a guy who spent a career criticizing the WC......and it turns out he lied to them. Guy had a brass set I'll give him that.

You'd think that believers would get embarrassed at being caught lying so blatantly so often.

But Anderson just keeps right on posting lies, despite the fact that he can't defend his lie by quoting ANYTHING Mark Lane said in his testimony.

Why is it that critics are citing the evidence, and believers are simply spouting their un-sourced and provably false opinion?