[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:Either produce my statement saying that smoke was indisputably there, or retract your blatant lie!

Here is your statement

Ben Holmes Wrote:The right question is "Was smoke seen in Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63 immediately following the assassination?

And the answer is - indisputably.

Now, either you are having another major English comprehension problem......or there is something seriously wrong.

So calling me a liar on that point - well sorry you really don't deserve a response on that.....

Sorry Patrick, you have NOT QUOTED ME SAYING THAT "SMOKE" WAS INDISPUTABLY THERE.

I stated that that smoke was SEEN by eyewitnesses...

There's quite a bit of difference between the assertion that smoke was seen - AND THIS IS ADMITTED EVEN BY YOU, and the claim that it was "indisputably" smoke which was seen.

Here was your lie again:

Patrick C Wrote:I would accept that those witnesses thought they saw smoke and perhaps they did.. But that does not prove it was there....you stated it was there "indisputably"......

Now until you retract your lie, or QUOTE ME SAYING THAT SMOKE WAS INDISPUTABLY SEEN, I'm going to keep charging you with telling lies.