[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:Time and time again, critics have schooled believers on this topic - THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT A BULLET WAS PLANTED. There is, however; evidence for a swapped bullet.

But it's certainly true that before much of this evidence came out, critics presumed a planted bullet... critics, however; are willing to follow the evidence - believers seem stuck in 1964.

Planting a bullet whilst JC was in surgery would have made no sense and could have complicated things immensely for obvious reasons....

I have always accepted that a swap out at a later stage makes far more sense within the realms of a conspiracy scenario involving a second rearward shooter who struck JC directly. This cannot be ruled out. Do I think it happened, no, but that is merely an informed opinion.

Informed based on WHAT evidence?

You, of all people, are well aware for the tremendous body of evidence that the bullet was swapped out... so on what is your "informed opinion" being based on?

Patrick C Wrote:The notion that the anterior neck would is an entry I find very difficult to accept, but I do accept that the windshield could have deflected the bullet from ahead strike to a neck strike, the issue I have is what happened to the back entry bullet......

This projectile is going to penetrate....and it ain't going to fall out during chest massage - I have done my homework on this.....unless the bullet was a dud....but here is the "kicker" as you Americans would say.....supposing that back shot was a dud......would it not drop more than 1ft over 65 yards if it was an intended head shot.....?

If it was not a dud....it WILL exit....

You are, of course, basing this opinion on speculation ... speculation on what type of bullet, what velocity, etc... Why were the prosectors forbidden from dissecting the path of this bullet?

Until you can provide a credible reason for this military order - you're not going to go anywhere...