[Patrick C]

David Healy Wrote:Here's you problem with this line of reaction Patrick, first we assume you're .john's and Mel Ayton's lone nut spokeperson here.

Never spoken to either of them and don't know them. I had at one point thought of meeting Mel Ayton up in Durham, but never got round to it.

David Healy Wrote:Second you're an ardent defender of the 1964 WCR and its lies with noting else other than the devil told you to believe.

Well I certainly think Oswald acted alone beyond reasonable doubt. I think the report is flawed. I think they should have placed more emphasis on the 2 shot only scenario and much less in the 3 shots in less than 6 seconds.

David Healy Wrote:You've shown no cause for anyone here or otherwise to believe you other than fractured and hard to believe opinion.

Is that supposed to make sense? If you are asking me if I have considered that my opinion is wrong - yes of course and I believed there was probably a conspiracy from 1980 to around 1993 or maybe slightly later.

David Healy Wrote:You have not authenticated the alleged original, in-camera Zapruder film currently housed at NARA today. Why?

I have seen the canister in NA in Washington DC, but I have not seen the original film. Nor would I have the skill set to make the evaluation regarding authenticity. But I can read reports of people who have.

The notion that the film was altered is ridiculous. Zapruder had the film with him until he handed it over to Stolly at Time Life - by which time the three copies were made and countless stills issued of the original film. If the film was subsequently altered, ALL of the Zapruder film and photo materials would have to have been found and recalled and destroyed. This is simply impossible.

David Healy Wrote:The film and photo evidence related to this case is in horrible shape.

I simply do not agree.

David Healy Wrote:The best lone nuts can come up with is simple: "Neither the Z film nor Altgens photos are altered Ben."

They can come up with a lot more than that David and you know it.

A short post from me on this forum is not representative of the counter arguments out there on JFK assassination film forgery and I am certainly not going to waste my time digging into the subject in detail for you guys who will clearly not shift your views a millimetre!!!

David Healy Wrote:The idea that they are is within the domain of crackpot theories on this case." Sounds familiar Patrick? Sounds lone nut desperate to me, Patrick.

Not at all and I could not disagree more. The notion that the Z film and Nix film have not been altered is everyday common sense - there is nothing crackpot about that.