#29
Conspiracy JFK Forum
A Rifle Through The Post Office???
Re: A Rifle Through The Post Office???
McAdams shows clearly the witness statement and the corresponding location such as Knoll or TSBD or could not say.
This is where the totals come from. There is no deception. The statements are accurate and so is the determination of the opinion on the source.
The simple fact is that the vast majority of witness by some considerable magnitude, thought there were three, two or three or just two shots.
It would be no surprise to me if there were only 2 shots, IMO had there been three or more shots, it seems logical to deduce that there might have been far more reports of 4, 5 or even 6 shots given the composite sound of gunfire and echoes in the plaza.
One of the reasons I rate Phantom Shot so highly is that it looks at all the alternative theories around a second shooter (or third) and their locations and expertly dismisses most alternatives as what they are - delusional or as I prefer to say politely "fairy tales".
Less politely one might describe them as wishful thinking by those of the conspiratorial mind set.
Of course we can never rule out a second shooter from the rear making a missed shot - and that bullet disintegrating, but of course we know of no evidence for that shooter.
Do you mean the 6.5mm black object?
It is obviously a photographic anomaly. One shot struck JFK in the head and the bullet exited, leaving several small particles in a trail from rear to front.
This is where the totals come from. There is no deception. The statements are accurate and so is the determination of the opinion on the source.
The simple fact is that the vast majority of witness by some considerable magnitude, thought there were three, two or three or just two shots.
It would be no surprise to me if there were only 2 shots, IMO had there been three or more shots, it seems logical to deduce that there might have been far more reports of 4, 5 or even 6 shots given the composite sound of gunfire and echoes in the plaza.
One of the reasons I rate Phantom Shot so highly is that it looks at all the alternative theories around a second shooter (or third) and their locations and expertly dismisses most alternatives as what they are - delusional or as I prefer to say politely "fairy tales".
Less politely one might describe them as wishful thinking by those of the conspiratorial mind set.
Of course we can never rule out a second shooter from the rear making a missed shot - and that bullet disintegrating, but of course we know of no evidence for that shooter.
Do you mean the 6.5mm black object?
It is obviously a photographic anomaly. One shot struck JFK in the head and the bullet exited, leaving several small particles in a trail from rear to front.
| Messages In This Thread |
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)