[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:Lost what..?

I am not hear to win or loose. I don't give a jot.

Ben Holmes Wrote:time and time again you refuse to make a case refuting what I've stated about the evidence.

We have exchanged views on the case for YEARS on Amazon and I have challenged you HUNDREDS of times. So that is hardly "time and time again" is it Holmes?

Quote just ONE example where I've not answered your 'challenge'. But you won't... you can't. You KNOW that there's nothing you can say about the evidence that I don't have an answer for.

The same is not true for you. You run from quite a bit of the evidence in this case, you do so over and over again...then pretend that you're too "busy" to get around to answering.

What was the largest foreign object seen in the AP X-ray?

It's a question that can be answered in a single sentence... yet you've repeatedly run from it.

And this is just ONE example!!

Patrick C Wrote:I would be confident that in an open public debate with you Ben, with an audience of 100% neutrals I would convince a majority there was no conspiracy.

And yet here, in a written forum, where each has the opportunity to think about, research, and answer fully - you can't do it.

Yet you pretend that in a different arena, you'd suddenly start winning... :roll:

Ben Holmes Wrote:Most of your arguments are weak and many are sensational - for example your multiple 5 to 7 shooters, including a scenario in which there are two shooters firing out of the SE 6th floor window which is based on pure guesswork on your part.

You're lying again, Patrick. You know quite well that I've pointed out that eyewitnesses put a shooter in the opposite window from the SN. It's not "pure guesswork" as you claim. Tell us Patrick, why do I successfully (and unrefuted by you) point out lies time and time again from you and other believers - yet the opposite never seems to happen?

Why does the 'truth' need lies to support it?