[Patrick C]

"Who's making things up?"

Not me Benny.....

"The fact that the "sound pattern" for two locations is "reflected" in the witness testimony. It's good to see that you refuse to state otherwise."

You know full well that the witnesses fell into two distinct groups:

ALL shots Grassy Area / behind Elm....OR
ALL shots TSBD

And we all know that a shot struck Kennedy and Connally in the back......

So therefore we can deduce that the people who thought ALL the shots came from the front were wrong because they did not ALL come from the front. This infers that they were also wrong about the other shot or shots they heard being from the front.

Yes I believe it is most likely that had audible shots come from two directions a significant number of witnesses would have reflected that.

I also think it is most likely had there been more than three shots, given the echoes, the composition of a rifle shot, that we would have many more statements of 4 or 5 or even 6 shots. We do not.

This argument that so few sounds were heard is strongly supportive of Mike Majerus' TWO shot only theory.