[Patrick C]

Ray Mitcham Wrote:A bit like the Parkland doctors who saw a wound in the back of the head and an entrance wound in the throat.

Absolute nonsense. The doctors perceived the wound to be further back than it actually was. A simple mistake.

The actual true back of the head was not visible to them because it was cushioned. Scalp and blood would however fall and drip out of the head given the position of the body - a concept we all know as gravity. Enough said.

It was EXACTLY where is appears to be in the Z film and exactly as it is described in the autopsy. And they were NOT threatened, that is ridiculous and wayward conspiracy minded nonsense fuelled by sensationalist authors of the likes of crackpots Jim Marrs and Harrison Livingstone.

I actually met two of the attending Dallas doctors at conventions in the 80s and this was a question asked of them - frankly they laughed.

They were almost certainly reminded not to speculate, but to remain guarded and professional around the media, but that was all.

They did not make any kind of reliable medical ballistics (forensic) analysis of the anterior neck wound either in Trauma room 1 so your comment about that being a frontal entry (presumably based on Perry's comment that it could have been entry) is just plain silly - as is the ridiculous theory that a bullet was fired from the front and struck Kennedy in the neck and was one of TWO that did not exit. It is a fairy tale.