[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:

Ray Mitcham Wrote:A bit like the Parkland doctors who saw a wound in the back of the head and an entrance wound in the throat.

Absolute nonsense. The doctors perceived the wound to be further back than it actually was. A simple mistake.

The same mistake made by the Autopsy Report, when it put the wound IN THE SAME LOCATION using the same terms... 'Occipital Parietal'.

So the 'absolute nonsense' is only coming from people such as you, Patrick.

Patrick C Wrote:The actual true back of the head was not visible to them because it was cushioned.

A common factoid often told by believers... but an absolute LIE.

Richard Dulaney Wrote:...Somebody lifted up his head and showed me the back of his head. We couldn't see much until they picked up his head. I was standing beside him. The wound was on the back of his head. On the back side

Patrick knows this, yet doesn't mind repeating the factoid...

Patrick C Wrote:It was EXACTLY where is appears to be in the Z film and exactly as it is described in the autopsy.

Tell us Patrick, what's the difference between "Occipital Parietal" and "Occipital Parietal"?

Patrick C Wrote:And they were NOT threatened, that is ridiculous and wayward conspiracy minded nonsense fuelled by sensationalist authors of the likes of crackpots Jim Marrs and Harrison Livingstone.

The prosectors provably were.

Patrick C Wrote:They did not make any kind of reliable medical ballistics (forensic) analysis of the anterior neck wound either in Trauma room 1 so your comment about that being a frontal entry (presumably based on Perry's comment that it could have been entry) is just plain silly - as is the ridiculous theory that a bullet was fired from the front and struck Kennedy in the neck and was one of TWO that did not exit. It is a fairy tale.

Of course, this non-examination of the throat wound conducted at Parkland IS THE ONLY MEDICAL EXAMINATION THAT WAS EVER MADE.