[Ben Holmes]

Henry Sienzant Wrote:Now, what's the evidence the Z-film is altered again?

We've just covered one of them - to wit, that no-one ever noted a limo stop in the film prior to Alvarez.

Henry Sienzant Wrote:What's the evidence the witnesses that saw a limo STOP were correct, especially since others only mentioned a limo slow-down, and the film shows a slow-down, not a stop?

Simple common sense... tell us Henry, what would be the characteristics of those witnesses whom you'd accept as more credible?

HONEST people would state that Police Officers are generally more credible.
HONEST people would accept that closer eyewitnesses are generally more credible.
HONEST people would accept that when a person is DIRECTLY AFFECTED by the conditions, they would be more credible.

All four of the motorcycle police who were TRACKING THE LIMO TO SET THEIR OWN SPEED stated that the limo stopped.

Henry Sienzant Wrote:Ben will argue that the limo STOP and SLOW-DOWN witnesses should be treated as a group, but there's obviously a difference between a stop and a slow-down, so Ben's argument is not persuasive.

This is not too unlike arguing that water is a deadly poison. Of course, it actually IS - but there's the slight problem, rarely do people encounter conditions where it's deadly. But it's not unknown to drink too much, and die.

It's obvious even to a moron that there's a TREMENDOUS difference between a car that parked in a parking spot all day long, and someone who pulled to the curb to pick up someone. No-one would confuse the two at all.

But a limo that came to a stop of roughly 2 seconds? And witnesses dozens or hundreds of feet away, in crowded conditions?

Henry has a huge credibility problem here.

This is actually a tactic quite favored by the WCR Supporters... The INTENTIONAL misinterpretation of witnesses. The limo didn't stop, because eyewitnesses reported that it slowed down.

Henry cannot imagine that witnesses could observe the same event, and depending on their distance or acuteness of observation, describe it differently.

Does it sound familiar? The shots came from the TSBD... because almost EVERYONE reported a single location for the shots. The ones that reported the Grassy Knoll are all wrong, because we know that the shots came from the TSBD.

A limo that stopped for 2 seconds could EASILY be described as one that slowed down dramatically. And indeed, this explanation EXPLAINS ALL THE KNOWN EYEWITNESS STATEMENTS.

If the limo merely slowed dramatically, it fails to explain the most credible witnesses of all, who state that it came to a very brief stop.

The fact that NONE of this is seen in the extant Z-film to the casual viewer is something believers still cannot explain. It took Alvarez to do a frame by frame analysis to detect a slowdown.

And nothing Henry can do will change that historical fact.