Posts: 450
Threads:11
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance WCR Supporter
RE: Warren Commission Lies About NAA Testing...
(07-30-2016, 02:43 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote: Patrick C Wrote:Ben, I was toying with you.
And yet, it wasn't me that was looking dumb... what an insane suggestion!
Patrick C Wrote:I know full well you wash your hands when you wash your face.
However my point about his hands coming into more contact with the two weapons than his face that day is a fair point and you should accept that.
Nope. No need to do so when the EVIDENCE shows that Oswald should have had "heavy deposits" on his cheeks. This is, of course, evidence that YOU will refuse to publicly admit.
And once again, you're still refusing to address the actual lie of omission told by the Warren Commission - their refusal to gather the full testimony on the NAA and it's results.
Not surprising really - you're a coward, Patrick - you continue to provably run from any questions that would force you to admit problems in this case.
Such as the Railroad shot...
Ben Holmes Wrote:No need to do so when the EVIDENCE shows that Oswald should have had "heavy deposits" on his cheeks.
I disagree - you might try getting your facts straight.
And incidentally, suggesting that Oswald's hands came into more contact with his weapons is perfectly reasonable.
This post was last modified: 07-31-2016, 04:36 PM by
Ben Holmes.