[Mark Ulrik]

(08-01-2016, 05:32 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(08-01-2016, 03:46 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  McAdams categorises the rail road tracks as "Knoll" - well based on for example - see statement from Danny Arce.

No Patrick, you are provably wrong.

McAdams DOES NOT categorize the Railroad yard as the Grassy Knoll.

For example, Peggy Hawkins CD897 - yet McAdams places her as a "RR Yard" witness - removing her from her logical place as a Knoll witness.

That ONE PROVABLE EXAMPLE shows that the McAdams tabulation is not accurate, as you keep implying.

Now, would you like to retract your false claim that "Oh I think the McAdams Post direction assimilation is unassailable in terms of accuracy of interpretation of witness statements.?"

Since it's now been proven wrong...

Notice how long it's taken for you to get to the point where you cannot but accept that you're wrong. It's taken DAYS of posts just to get you to admit the basic facts... facts that prove that your "opinion" is wrong.

Wow, Ben has found one(!) arguable designation in McAdams' earwitness tabulation. That still makes it a million times more accurate and reliable than anything that someone like Mark Lane ever published on the matter.