[Guest]

(08-18-2016, 01:53 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

Quote:"A surveyor then placed his sighting equipment at the precise point of entry on the back of the president's neck, assuming that the President had been struck at frame 210, and measured the angle to the end of the muzzle of the rifle positioned where it was believed to have been held by the assassin." (WCR 106)

The WC was not a perfect investigation - it could never have been.

However there should be no issue with the SBF - the bullet beyond almost any doubt would transit. It would then either hit the car or Connally.

Whether or not it was CE399 is another question. It could have been swapped out at a later date as Martin Hay believes. But it is madness to suggest that it was planted on 22 Nov at Parkland. Utter bonkers.

I always accepted the SBT - it makes absolutely the most sense and I remain to this day perplexed that it is not accepted - ie that ONE bullet cause the non fatal wounds to both men. That it was another bullet to CE399 is a reasonable alternative theory if indeed there was a cover up to conceal a conspiracy from the American people.

Do I think that happened - no I do not, but it remains a possibility. There is however very little to suggest the presence of a second rear positioned gunman.