#1
Conspiracy JFK Forum
Believers Who Lie About The Evidence...
Believers Who Lie About The Evidence...
The following exchange recently occurred on this forum:
Patrick has had an opportunity to retract or support his claim (he also claimed that Mike Majerus book also refuted Mark Lane's point raised here)
Then asserts that he's not a liar...
Yet there's STILL no page reference to look at, or a list of witnesses in those first two days that Patrick can total up to less than a majority for the Grassy Knoll.
Why is this? Why do believers consistently refuse to support the lies that they tell about the evidence? How can Patrick believe himself honest when he absolutely refuses to defend his claims?
Ben Holmes Wrote:Patrick C Wrote:Ben Holmes Wrote:But, as Mark Lane pointed out many years ago - the witnesses who were on the record in the first two days, 11/22 and 11/23 - quite overwhelmingly pointed to the Grassy Knoll.
Bull shit - no they did not.
You're lying again, Patrick. You'll NEVER support such a claim with evidence. Just as Mark refused to do.
So tell us Patrick - why are you a liar?
Patrick has had an opportunity to retract or support his claim (he also claimed that Mike Majerus book also refuted Mark Lane's point raised here)
Then asserts that he's not a liar...
Yet there's STILL no page reference to look at, or a list of witnesses in those first two days that Patrick can total up to less than a majority for the Grassy Knoll.
Why is this? Why do believers consistently refuse to support the lies that they tell about the evidence? How can Patrick believe himself honest when he absolutely refuses to defend his claims?
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)