[Patrick C]

(09-02-2016, 02:01 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  The following exchange recently occurred on this forum:

Ben Holmes Wrote:

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:But, as Mark Lane pointed out many years ago - the witnesses who were on the record in the first two days, 11/22 and 11/23 - quite overwhelmingly pointed to the Grassy Knoll.

Bull shit - no they did not.

You're lying again, Patrick. You'll NEVER support such a claim with evidence. Just as Mark refused to do.

So tell us Patrick - why are you a liar?

Patrick has had an opportunity to retract or support his claim (he also claimed that Mike Majerus book also refuted Mark Lane's point raised here)

Then asserts that he's not a liar...

Yet there's STILL no page reference to look at, or a list of witnesses in those first two days that Patrick can total up to less than a majority for the Grassy Knoll.

Why is this? Why do believers consistently refuse to support the lies that they tell about the evidence? How can Patrick believe himself honest when he absolutely refuses to defend his claims?

As I explained to you there is NO page ref from Mike Majerus' book ref the majority stating 2 shots not 3, because he is NOT saying that and neither am I !!!

The majority stated 3 shots initially, BUT initially more people stated two and then CHANGED their MIND when they heard the media reports.

Lane is incorrect when he states that on 22/23 Nov a MAJORITY of witnesses said they thought the shots came from the Knoll area. They did NOT. The majority of witnesses said to the rear and high.

Of those that DID say they thought shots came from the KNOLL...almost all stated ALL the shots camme from there - and clearly they are mistaken because at least two shots struck from the rear.

I don't know how many times I have to explain this to you.

And as I stated, I am not a liar and never have been - what is the point...? There would be zero point - I would be deluding myslef and working on a false premis. I am a far more educated man than you Holmes - that is evident in your posts which frequently show flawed logic an dmisunderstanding - and I do not mean  that as a brag. It is simple reality and as a former academic in respect of this subject I would never lie - that is simply not in  my DNA.

I have also explained to you that people can make mistakes and people may HONESTLY mis-interpret evidence or opinion and or mistakenly use error based sources - as YOU do with the deceptive Mr. Mark Lane.