#6
Conspiracy JFK Forum
Believers Who Lie About The Evidence...
RE: Believers Who Lie About The Evidence...
Which part of "there is no page reference" do you not comprehend...?
Niether Mike M nor I claim that more people stated there were 2 shots than 3. What I stated was that the number of people who thought there were only two shots decreased as some of them changed their minds as they were influenced by media reports.
Mike M in his book does not address Mark Lane's claim that the majority of witnesses stated the GK was the source of the shots on 22 and 23 Nov 1963. That is my assertion and it does not come from a single book. It is based on my knowledge of the case and appraisal of the witness statements.
Oh and I am not running from anything Holmes, I just consider exchanging comments with you on the JFK case laregly pointless because your logic is frankly a joke.
Niether Mike M nor I claim that more people stated there were 2 shots than 3. What I stated was that the number of people who thought there were only two shots decreased as some of them changed their minds as they were influenced by media reports.
Mike M in his book does not address Mark Lane's claim that the majority of witnesses stated the GK was the source of the shots on 22 and 23 Nov 1963. That is my assertion and it does not come from a single book. It is based on my knowledge of the case and appraisal of the witness statements.
Oh and I am not running from anything Holmes, I just consider exchanging comments with you on the JFK case laregly pointless because your logic is frankly a joke.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)