[Patrick C]

(09-08-2016, 02:24 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE... 

• The "hard evidence" of the 6.5mm virtually round object in the AP X-ray... 
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of the medically observed appearance of the bullet wound in the throat... 
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of clothing, which was irrationally refused to the prosectors for examination.
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of autopsy photos & X-rays that have disappeared.
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of photos showing a bullet being recovered in the grass.
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of Frazier - and how the Warren Commission went 'expert shopping' to find Nicol...
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of a fingerprint in the 'sniper's nest' that was never identified.
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of NAA testing that was concealed by the Warren Commission. (and lied about to this very day)
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of rifle testing, where the Warren Commission used real experts, firing from half the height, at oversized stationary targets with all the time they wanted for the first shot.
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of the lack of 'First Frame Flash' in the extant Zapruder film - the very same error that proved the 'alien autopsy' film a fake. (Patrick has been known to run from this one!)
  
  
• The "hard evidence" of the curb near Tague being patched. Tell us about the ballistic path of that bullet.
  

Believers can run, but they can't address the hard evidence in this case... to say nothing about the eyewitness testimony...

HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE... 

• The "hard evidence" of the 6.5mm virtually round object in the AP X-ray... 
  

It is an anomaly – there was no bullet found in JFK

• The "hard evidence" of the medically observed appearance of the bullet wound in the throat... 
  

That is not hard evidence – that is medical guess work

• The "hard evidence" of clothing, which was irrationally refused to the prosectors for examination.
  

No it was not….

• The "hard evidence" of autopsy photos & X-rays that have disappeared.
  
• The "hard evidence" of photos showing a bullet being recovered in the grass.
  

That is not hard evidence. It is a photo of a light haired suited man with his fingers on the grass. There is no bullet visible and the accompanying DPD stated no bullet we found. Holmes you are misleading or even lying here because you CANNOT determine from that photo if a bullet has been found. That is only a possibility.

• The "hard evidence" of Frazier - and how the Warren Commission went 'expert shopping' to find Nicol...
  
• The "hard evidence" of a fingerprint in the 'sniper's nest' that was never identified.
  

So what! Why would you necessarily identify a finger print ! What a ridiculous thing to say!!

The following four are minor challenges to the no conspiracy theorist I accept.

• The "hard evidence" of NAA testing that was concealed by the Warren Commission. (and lied about to this very day)
  
• The "hard evidence" of rifle testing, where the Warren Commission used real experts, firing from half the height, at oversized stationary targets with all the time they wanted for the first shot.
  
• The "hard evidence" of the lack of 'First Frame Flash' in the extant Zapruder film - the very same error that proved the 'alien autopsy' film a fake. (Patrick has been known to run from this one!)
  
• The "hard evidence" of the curb near Tague being patched. Tell us about the ballistic path of that bullet.