[Ben Holmes]

(09-11-2016, 03:43 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:The evidence clearly shows that the shot that killed Kennedy entered from the front.

Absolute sheer unadultarated tripe.

There is nothing "clearly" about it. The very concept is wayward, wishful conspiracy thinking of the most extreme order. It is within the domain of crackpot body and film alteration speculation that belies common sense.

I realize how upsetting this is to you... but the evidence for a large back of the head wound, combined with the fact that the X-rays show the largest fragments to the back of the head, is clear supporting evidence for a shot striking JFK's temple. Exactly as the very earliest statements by eyewitnesses indicated.

Ad hominem attacks on those who merely point to the evidence illustrate that you realize just how weak your case is... and forces you to strike out.
 

I'm quite sure you're familiar with this:



Naturally, you're also familiar with this one:



And of course, the classic:

As you well know, this is merely the tip of the iceberg for the evidence of a temple wound, and a large back of the head wound... Naturally, you know all this evidence is from actual eyewitnesses, who were there, and saw; yet you pretend that people who merely point this evidence out, and draw the natural conclusions must be extreme crackpots.

The real story of course, is the fact that you cannot even admit the contradictions in the evidence...